Bennett Lumber redevelopment update 4/7/12
Featured, Real Estate — By Thatcher Imboden on April 7, 2012 10:41 amThe three-block stretch on the north side of the Midtown Greenway between Fremont Avenue and Colfax Avenue, also known as the Bennett Lumber site, continues to move towards redevelopment. As you may recall, Greystar purchased the far east parcel in early 2012 and planned to take over development plans to construct approximately 220 apartment units.
In March 2012, the project’s Architect (ESG) presented to the Lowry Hill East Neighborhood Association Board and provided a brief update on the east parcel’s design as well as indicated that Greystar would like to purchase the remaining sites.
Highlights of the east parcel:
- Would like to have a LEED building.
- Promenade still going to happen.
- Strongly considering removing the wall packs on the outside of the building to make it prettier and potentially more energy efficient.
- There will be a bike in/out connection to the Greenway at the Greenway level.
- Should start construction at end of April.

A revised rendering of the Bennett East site, looking north over the Midtown Greenway between Colfax Avenue (right) and Dupont Avenue (left).
In addition, the architect discussed with the neighborhood some concepts for the other parcels. At the end of the day, the project would likely have 700-something apartment units in what will likely be 3+ buildings. The “conservative” (my word) model showed a six story building on both parcels adjacent the Greenway and stepping down to four stories on the middle site and three stories on the west site. (See photo below).
Other models were presented simply to gauge whether or not the community would want to go through the process of discussing slightly reconfigured models. The models included looking at an eight story option on one part of one building with slightly shorter other buildings or an even taller option of a 13 story skinny tower with a short base on the far west parcel. Generally, the majority of the conversation from a few neighborhood residents was that there wasn’t interest in discussing a 13 story building. One resident did speak up saying that he thought the conversation was worth having, in part because having every building being six and four stories may not be desirable.
It sounded like ESG would discuss with Greystar their next move and come back to the neighborhood.
Other highlights:
- Promenade would extend west on the south edge of the site, with a grand staircase between Dupont and Emerson.
- All buildings would have a different architectural look.
- All buildings would have the same density.
- Different size buildings could allow for different housing unit types, like townhomes.






Digg This
Bookmark
Stumble
8 Comments
I like the massing diagram you show here. Seems very appropriate.
I think it looks like, no matter how you feel about these buildings going up, it will definitely be worth checking out.
I like the idea of 1 or 2 towers surrounded by shorter base buildings
Why not consider 13 stories? If it is on the north side there would be no shadow on the Greenway. The neighborhood would benefit from the higher density, and this would help support the idea of light rail coming to the area.
Right on. It’s worth exploring, at least. Ruling certain designs out right off the bat doesn’t seem like a very fair or equitable approach for either the developer or the community.
I am against a 13-story building in the middle of uptown with residential houses and condo/townhomes nearyby. It would destroy the overall look of the location.
Are these going to be rental apartments or condo units?
Ruin the look of the location? There’s lots of very dense (by Minneapolis standards) buildings nearby. This is right in the core, heart of uptown where the densest development is going to occur. The MoZaic project is right there. Hopefully these types of developments are the types of improvements in the area that can make MoZaic Phase II happen soon (and hopefully that ends up being the long yearned for Hotel Uptown!)
Uptown is a dense location, and is only getting denser. If you start putting ridiculous artificial limits on building heights you would be preventing people from living in uptown who would love to live there. Why are you so concerned with keeping these areas empty? I would say probably 80% of the city is only single family homes. ONE of those neighborhoods can change without ruining anything. some people just like to over-react.